Home

Avatar

  • Dec. 19th, 2009 at 9:50 PM
How_yosemite
Saw it in 3D, which IMHO is the only way to see this flick. I give it 3 stars. Minus one star for inane, utilitarian, sometimes Just Plain Annoying soundtrack. I actually had to put my fingers in my ears once. Minus one star for way too much violence, coupled with the completely unbelievable results of the Final War, and the tacky mano-a-mano hand to hand combat scene at the end.

I ought to knock of half a star for the total lack of acting, but Cameron was going for stereotypes, and Avatar has those under every rock.

Artwork is out of this world, which is only right because the setting is on another planet. A lot of imagination went into the scenery, the indigenous sapeints and the flora and fauna. Not so much the military gear - most of that was sci-fi boilerplate.  Cinematography and CG are superb, and blend seamlessly.

Worth matinée with the 3D surcharge.

Tags:

Thai Star, 1007 Boren Ave Seattle

  • Dec. 5th, 2009 at 11:19 PM
How_yosemite
Had dinner at this very basic hole in the wall. The menu confused me, because most of the dishes on it are not Thai. Mongolian beef, won ton soup, mee noodles, etc. I had the tom kha gai, it was pretty bad, way overloaded with galangal and the chicken chunks were too big. Instead of being off-white the broth was pink. Sesame duck was a tiny portion for $12, some of the duck was pure gristle. The veggies in it were good, but again not cut small enough for a Thai stir-fry dish. The waiter was nice, we chatted in Thai, in 2 weeks he is going back home for the first time in 5 years, I was able to give him some tips about changes in Bangkok since then. The Thai iced tea was okay, but over-priced. Total $22 for what should have cost $12.

Tags:

Precious

  • Nov. 27th, 2009 at 10:54 PM
How_yosemite
Went to see Precious at the one small theater in PA where it's playing. It is beyond excellent. It needs to be given full distribution. You need to see it.

Director Lee Daniels has put together an amazing cast. Who knew that Mo'Nique could give an Oscar-worthy performance as a psychotic abusive welfare momma? Who knew Mariah Carey could be so convincing as a cynical dowdy Brooklyn Jewish social worker? I walked out of the theater not believing it was her. Lenny Kravitz as a male nurse? A lot has been said on TV and in the press about the woman playing the title role,  Gabourey 'Gabby' Sidibe.  There is a lot of talent there, I hope we'll be seeing more of her in the future. Paula Patton as alternative school teacher Ms. Rains is a babe - she reminded me of Phylicia Rashad in The Cosby Show. Where has she been hiding?

There are a lot of small parts in this film, but no small actors. Everyone in the cast brought out as much of his/her character as there was to bring. That's the mark of a fine director. The film was shot on a budget, but the tech never gets in the way of the story. There are some minor editing mistakes, but they are on transitions which are just setting us up for the next scene. Makeup is so good it isn't even there. Costuming has its moments during the title character's fantasy sequences, and she gets to wear some great outfits. Queen Latifa would be proud.

The screenplay by Geoffrey Fletcher is powerful, visual, articulate and real. Based on the novel Push by Sapphire.

Many of my friends will urge you to see the movie for nits powerful message, its overwhelming window into child abuse, incest, AIDS, the welfare culture, etc. I'll urge you to see it for wall to wall superb performances such as we have not seen on the screen for a long time.

Tags:

Glee

  • Oct. 5th, 2009 at 12:04 AM
Head Bang
Love the singing and general musicianship. Do not love the choice of tunes. Hate the dialog writing. Totally confused by which characters are on what side(s). Wake me up when the show finds a sense of direction.

Tags:

Micro-review x 2

  • Sep. 2nd, 2009 at 12:32 AM
How_yosemite
Tonight's entertainment was the last remake of War of the Worlds, which I ejected from the player after about 35 minutes which seemed like 6 hours. Total fail. The script kept the tripods and threw out everything else. Poor cinematography, cheesy special effects, directing so poor that Dakota Fanning comes across as less talented than Tom Cruise. Iffy score, uneven audio, let's not even talk about the dialog. If it wasn't from Netflix, I'd have shredded the disc, though it is not worth wasting landfill space on.

Since I had some extra time, I popped in Slumdog Millionaire. An above-average indie film, but no way did this deserve to be a Best Picture nominee, let alone winner. In fact, I don't think it was Oscar quality in any category except one it did not get nominated for - Makeup. And maybe Anil Kapoor as the smarmy TV host Prem could have been nominated for best supporting actor. Maybe. It was not well written, and I think its screenplay nomination was a sop to the fact that there is no "best story" award. The multiple stories which make up the explanations for how he knew the answers deserved some sort of special award, but not for screenwriting.

Tags:

HMB, Tommy Midnite Show and stuff

  • Aug. 24th, 2009 at 1:10 AM
How_yosemite

Let me just say that Half Moon Bay on a Saturday night is not one of the nation's hot spots. The only things open after 10 pm are Safeway, CVS and one hotel bar which was jam packed with wedding party guests.

Coastal Rep's midnight show of Tommy was sold out, after a mostly sold out run. I won't make too many digs at it because the cast , orchestra and crew had just had a full weekend of shows, including one which let out at about 10:45 that night. Considering all that, the energy level was way high, everyone in the cast and orchestra gave 110%, and so did the audience. It was an Event.

So let me get the one slam out first. Tech was horrible. Time and time again booming bass-frequency feedback drowned out the performers. Looking at the speakers at intermission, the pair of big-boy woofers on stage right were facing into the stage, not into the audience. That could have been a large part of the problem. There were also multiple times when singers' mikes weren't turned on until they were half a line into the song. Light cues also were messed up here and there - except for the opening number, the aerialist's performance was mostly in the dark. That was not only annoying but also dangerous.

Before the start of the show, the director read a note from the tech crew demanding that all cell phones be turned off, not just silenced, because the handshaking between the phone and the cell tower interfered with the theater's communication system. I have two things to say about that - first, "airplane mode" solves that issue, and most cell phones have that feature. And second, if your system is so lame that it gets munged by the minuscule keep-alive signal from a cell phone, you need a new system. One with wires.

And one mild dig - Bobby Conte Thornton, who plays the title role, is not as hot as he thinks he is. He was very good, it's a challenging part and he'd already done one performance that night, but I think his fans have gone to his head a little bit. I've seen better, yes, even at his age (the program says he's a high school Junior).

Moving onto the good news. There was a lot of outstanding talent in the cast. Robert Coverdell, who played The Lover, sang in the chorus, and was resurrected several times as a featured dancer, was outstanding. Anna Robertson did a breathtaking job as the aerialist, both on a large ring and also on a pair of cloth streamers suspended from the ceiling. Jordan Shepherd, who played 10-year-old Tommy was amazing - I hope being abused, beaten and whirled around on a pinball machine in the wee hours of the morning doesn't kill his theater bug. He had several tough entrances to make, and he was spot on. Also impressive was Brendan Quirk as evil cousin Kevin. The actress playing Kevin's moll, listed in the program as "Patty O'Furniture", also showed a deep understanding of the dark side.

There were lots of interesting costumes, including lots of choir robes, and the two older Tommys' white suits, various uniforms, kabuki masks and hippie dance outfits. Costume designer Lisa Claybaugh did a good job. Huge kudos go to co-set designers Rich Allen and Alice Engelmore who built a very basic pair of ramps up to a long narrow platform with dance poles, put the orchestra up there behind a scrim , and used minimalist rolling set pieces and the occasional love seat, which cast and crew (but mostly cast) wheeled in and out with clockwork precision. I'm not sure whose job it was to choreograph the set changes, but give that person a medal because they were many and they were flawless. I do have to say I was bothered by the lack of flipper buttons on the faux pinball machine.

Choreography was somewhat frenetic, but everyone on stage knew what they were supposed to be doing, and there was a lot of dancing. Kimberly Krol choreographed the show.

One of the features was a projection system which used the orchestra scrim as a screen. It provided a constant background for most of the show, and I have mixed feelings about it. The good news is the projection program was cleverly done, added to the feel of the scenes, and obviously a huge amount of editing work went into putting it together. The bad news is because it was so well done it distracted me big-time from the show itself.

The orchestra, under the direction of Ken Crowell, played their hearts out. After the show was over they kept going and going and going for the spontaneous on-stage partying. I love the French Horn part in this score and it sounded great. The program lists Katie Sablinsky and Nina Levine on horn. Guitarists Ross Dakin and Michael LaGuardia wailed and riffed and took it to another level.

Director Michael Lederman put together a phenomenon. So many things had to be coordinated for this show to not be a train wreck, and he did it. A standing ovation from 200 glowstick-waving audience members proved that.

Tags:

Wicked @ The Orpheum

  • Aug. 20th, 2009 at 3:23 PM
How_yosemite
Like many folks my age, my first contact with the land of Oz was in the Judy Garland, Margaret Hamilton, Billie Burke movie. I had never read the L. Frank Baum books as a child, but read most of them 10 or so years ago. My first exposure to Wicked was waking up one morning to my TV set showing one of my favorite musicals actresses of all time, Kristin Chenoweth and Idina Menzel on a bed in the middle of a street in NYC performing the song Popular for a morning show. I was impressed. Both women sang beautifully and showed great comic timing, and the song became a major earworm. I bought the OBC CD, and was taken with how powerful the solos and duets are, the ensemble pieces not so much.

Someone suggested I read the book. I did. It sucked. Happily, the musical shreds the book, balls up the confetti, throws it into a blender, and squeezes the results out the other end of the Broadway Tony Award-Winning Musicals grinder and a hit is born.

Last night I went to see the touring company in SF, and in a nutshell:
Wins:Read more... )

Tags:

Julie & Julia

  • Aug. 10th, 2009 at 4:09 PM
How_yosemite
I loved it. Two love stories separated by time, joined at the soul. Technically superb, it has been a long time since everything on the tech side worked so flawlessly that I was able to enjoy the movie. Amazing cinematography which was a feast for the eyes whether it was indoors, outdoors, day, night, scenery, people, or a close-up of a deboned duck. Audio so well mixed it never jars, and I understood every word from every actor (except some of the French ones- I don't speak much French). And real acting. Meryl Streep is Julia Child. Amy Adams is still a bit of more of a Disney princess as Julie Powell than the real Julie, but it works well with this screenplay. Stanley Tucci as Mr. Child is a rock. Chris Messina as Mr. Powell also holds his own in this stunning cast. I also really like Julie's cat.

Excellent writing,  and my only dig is they glossed over Julia's reaction of fangirl Julie's homage. It's a loose end which I'd have liked to see tied up, for better or for worse. There are some very touching moments, some very funny ones, and a few of the segues between time periods are perfect and seamless.

What else? Set dressing and props for this movie must have been a Herculean task, the staff rose to the occasion. Ditto costuming, though Julia's TV costume did not appear as well-made as I remember it. Something about the logo patch.

Worth full price. And to think I went to get into the air conditioning.

Tags:

No Cookies

  • Jul. 9th, 2009 at 1:55 AM
How_yosemite
The evening's Netflix DVD was Milk. Sean Penn is outstanding. Most of the rest of the cast is not. Victor Garber didn't get much screen time as Moscone, which was a blessing. He is about as much like Moscone as Cate Blanchett, only not as pretty.

Technically, the film sucks lemons through multiple garden hoses, sometimes simultaneously. Truly crappy cinematography, audio levels which jumped all over the place, I finally gave up and turned on subtitles. The black and white clips they showed at the start are disgustingly gratuitously artsy fartsy - all the TV news was in color 10 years before, this was not the 50's. The clips were poorly edited and should never have left the junior high art film project they came from.

The ending was also a study in how not to build suspense, how not to tell a story. The slo-mo at the finale was just stupid. And I never liked Tosca anyway.

The basic story is compelling, Penn carries the show well enough to make it worth seeing. The crowd scenes were impressive. I wonder if [info]rackstraw ever found himself among those thousands of other extras.

There is a lot of history in there which I either had not known or had completely forgotten. At the height of his fame I was overseas, I didn't hear the story till I moved to CA a few years later, Dianne was Mayor.

Tags:

Imax

  • May. 14th, 2009 at 11:42 PM
How_yosemite
After work I went to see the new Star Trek in IMAX. Well worth the extra $4 for the huge screen and comfy seats. For those who are not familiar with the original series, the film does stand on its own, but you get 500% more out of it if you have seen at least a handful of the original episodes.

I liked everything about this film except the music. It did not help that the theater had the audio cranked way too high (starting with the trailers), but that only made a horrible score worse. Especially toward the end when the composer goes all celestial choir on your ass. Oppressive, tuneless crap. Thank goodness much of the movie is set on the bridge of the Enterprise, where they don't play music.

They did something which totally broke from the original that I actually liked - everyone on the bridge is a child genius. And one thing I did not like - officers kissing in public. Totally wrong. But also totally hot.

Leonard Nimoy is wonderful, and I noticed the cinematography on his scenes, especially the close-ups, was better than the rest of the movie. It would have been fun to also have Shatner, and would have worked just fine within the plot line of the film.

The movie is about 2 hours long, I did not look at my watch once - riveting in places, held my interest throughout.

Tags:

Like a handprint on my heart

  • Apr. 8th, 2009 at 12:33 PM
How_yosemite
Wicked tears me in three directions at once. That's not nice. That's wicked.

I found this musical through a series of random events, Read more... ) My TV is my alarm clock, and this one morning it's tuned to The Today Show and there is a bed in the middle of the street in NYC, and on the bed are Kristen and someone green. The smarmy male announcer introduces the green woman as Idina Menzel, and the number is Popular from Wicked. It's all Kristen, this number, green woman is just a prop. The number is quirky and cute and hilarious and not nearly as easy to sing as Kristen makes it look.
embedded popular under here )

So I broke out the CD and gave it a real listen. Maybe 20 times. Steven Schwartz's music and lyrics are mostly good, often brilliant. Kristen and Idina are both amazing. Joel Grey (the original MC from Cabaret) is less bumbling than I'd expect the Wizard to be, but blame the script.

Which is where I'm torn.Read more... )

Some of the lyrics I like:
Read more... )
Another way I'm torn is Wicked is in SF right now, playing at the Orpheum, and I would love to see it. I know I won't be seeing Kristen and Idina, but there's a lot of talent out there, I may not be disappointed. However... orchestra seats are $225. The cheapest non-obstructed-view seat comes to more than $100 with the obscene $11 ticketmaster service charge. Those numbers are beyond "support the arts" and well into "become a patron", IMHO. I'll be getting a bonus at work next Friday, basically an extra half-month's pay. I've already blown some of it on a Nikon lens, maybe a trip to the theater will be in the cards after all.

Tags:

Bat Boy @ Foothill College

  • Mar. 13th, 2009 at 9:22 PM
How_yosemite
A friend in the cast told me about the Thursday special for those with the sekrit passwrd, so I went last night to Foothill College's brand spankking new Lohman Theater to see it. It helped that four of my favorite theater pals are in the cast, and it was directed by all-around nice guy Jay Manley.

The Lohman is the high-class replacement for the old black box theater, which was a not-converted-much meeting space up at the top of the very steep stairs. When I was in Jay's production of Bells Are Ringing mublety-mumble years ago, I dreaded that climb. But wiser and more hypertensive minds put the new theater at the bottom of the hill, spitting distance from the parking lot. Yay!

So I was in a good mood and really jazzed to see this show. It was...uh..er...different.

Some background: Half a dozen years ago, The Weekly World News ran a big series of articles about a boy who had been found in a cave in West Virginia, living with the bats. They applied more than their usual journalistic skilz to this endeavor, causing a sensation among their millions of supermarket line readers and all six subscribers. So of course the first thing which raced through the minds of Keythe Farley and Brian Flemming was "let's write a musical!" Aided and abetted by the musical prowess of Laurence O'Keefe, they did just that. The result was Bat Boy.

The inside of the Lohman Theater is cave-like. By hanging some fabric stelagtites/mites and building a very simple set of columns dressed up to be cave-like, with some bats hanging from the light poles, we have a passable cave. All expenses were spared in this production, but these are desperate times for theaters, so I'm not complaining. Set construction was done by a class at Foothill. Costumes also were home grown, and also mostly credited to a theater class. The show doesn't need much in the way of costumes, but the forest menagerie scene had me sitting there with my mouth hanging open, marveling at the grade school Halloween quality of the costumes.

Moving on...

The cast was miked. This is a theater small enough that the cast can spit on the back row, microphones were not called for, and most of them were over-modulated and way too treble-equalized. The only good thing about the audio is there was no feedback.

The programs are a hoot - done on tabloid format newsprint, with the cast bios crammed into one unreadable paragraph.

So much for the technical.

The basic plot of Bat Boy is pretty straightforward. Starving boy found in cave by trailer trash, brought to the backwoods sheriff, who takes it to the veterinarian. Vet's wife and daughter tutor the boy and bring him to the tent revival to be healed. Or something like that. Backwards townspeople blame the freak for the cattle plague and Frankenstein logic ensues.

The music is not memorable, but Spencer Williams did a great job of maximizing the harmonizing skills of the ensemble. Anything with more than two parts is rock solid and on key. The script is not particularly clever or memorable either, but everyone seemed to have their lines down, and the over-choreographed numbers were executed well.

The play attempts to mock Christian Charity, trailer trash, coal miners, mob rule, and all the things which the Weekly World News thrives on. It was a great idea, but the results are uneven.

Casting had several WTFs. The vet's wife, who sings a lot, made a habit of wandering around the scale in search of the right key. In fact, the only soloists who could sing are Tim Reynolds, who is amazing as the evil vet, and RaMond Thomas who belts out pseudo-gospel as Rev. Hightower. Thomas also flips flawlessly between that role, the part of a rancher, and the irate mother of Bat Boy's first victim. Michael Rhone got about 95% of the way through his Pan song before running out of steam.

Several people play multiple roles, wig and simple costume changes cover most of that, but a lot of the caricatures were like high school rip-offs of bad SNL. The laughs were mostly of the laugh-at and not the laugh-with variety. 

Another vocal feast was provided by the "shadow chorus", Kevin Hull, Walter M. Mayes, Brian Palac, Karyn Rondeau and Molly Thornton. Why they were in the chorus and not in the leading roles is a mystery to me.

I almost forgot Robert Brewer, in the title role. He was okay. He can sing well enough, and he hangs upside-down by his knees like a champ. But I have to say that his emaciated days are behind him, and when they put him into that cage in the orange jump suit, he did not even come close to looking like the description in the script of a starving under-aged boy. Orange is not one of the "thinning" colors. And make-up clue: if you want to look like you've been living in a filthy bat cave all your life, you might want to look dirty.

Bat Boy is a total romp for the cast. Go see it - as long as you are not expecting a classy, Broadway-quality show, you'll be entertained.

Performance Dates and Times:
February 27-March 22, 2009
Thursdays-Saturdays at 8pm
Sunday matinees at 2pm
Saturday matinees, March 14, 21 at 2pm


Tickets:
$26 General Admission.
$24 Seniors (65 and over).
$18 Students.
Not appropriate for children under 12 years of age.

Tags:

Oscars Quibbles

  • Feb. 23rd, 2009 at 1:10 PM
How_yosemite

Since I only watched the last half hour or so, this won't be long. All I saw was the last 5 minutes of the obits (I missed Heath but was very moved by the response to Paul Newman, which I think was richly deserved) best actress, best director, best actor, best picture.

I'll have to see The Reader - Kate has never impressed me as an actress, but sometimes experience works wonders. Slumdog Millionaire could not have been as good as the obviously emotionally skewed in favor of the underdog votes went, but I'll put that on my list just in case it really is a hidden gem. Haven't seen Milk yet, either, but Sean Penn has been robbed several times in the past, and I have no doubt his performance was deserving, and the spontaneous standing O and applause tells me most of Hollywood agrees.

So much for the personalities. The presentation made me want to puke. The time they spent serenading the nominees would have been better spent showing us clips from the movies which got them nominated in the first place. The best picture montage was a travesty, and I think it robbed the nominees and the previous winners both with such a poorly edited and inconsistent presentation. All I have to say is the person who produced that piece of crap needs to go back to the clinic and have the rest of the lobotomy performed.

Hugh Jackman is a stunning actor, he sings, he dances, he's very very pretty and has a lot of class. On the one hand, we saw almost none of him in the last half hour, thanks to the cavalcade of old thespians and bad montages. On the other hand, what we did see was not very entertaining. Blame the writers, I guess.

I forgot to Tivo it, but I'm sure there will be enough on NBC.com and Youtube to catch me up.

Tags:

Kitchen Witches - a review

  • Feb. 13th, 2009 at 10:12 AM
How_yosemite
One of the best things about Santa Clara Players' theater, a converted art pavilion behind the Triton Museum, is its 80 or so seats are all within spitting distance of the actors. This is a distinct advantage for the current production, where the audience is part of the show. Kitchen Witches takes place on the set of a public access station's cooking show, and theatergoers become the studio audience.

Written by Caroline Smith, the play gets off to a slow start, with far too much time spent establishing the relatively shallow characters of Ukrakian chef "Babchka" (Dee Baily), her son Steve (Steven Lewis) who produces and announces the show, and the ever-silent Peg the camera gal (Peggy Lynch). The boredom lifts with the entrance of rival chef Isobel "Izzy" Lomax (Carolyn Compton). This was supposed to have been Babchka's final episode, Izzy's show had already been canceled as well, but when the station manager's wife sees the Jerry Springer-like spat between the two, she has her husband offer the dueling chefs a show together, with Steve as producer.

Kitchen Witches includes lots of clever zingers, and some world class bickering between the two chefs. Casting of the women's parts is excellent with very contrasting personalities between the chefs, and Camera Gal is just plain weird in all the right ways. Lewis, however, strikes me as too old for his role, and gives the impression of far more competence than I think the playwright had in mind for the momma's boy caught in the middle of a war between two domineering matrons.

Matt Matthews has done his usual excellent directing job, the players have their lines down pat, the action moves along as quickly as the sometimes uneven script allows, and the staging is so well blocked that the 2-minute-drill cooking competition chaos scene didn't looked planned at all, though it has to have been minutely choreographed. And Matt made good use of his secret weapon - his wife Audrey created dozens of food props which looked good enough to eat. There was also a lot of real food on the set, a stage manager's nightmare which Michael Antonucci handled beautifully.

Jim Narveson's set is cleverly designed to split in half, and includes a working stand-alone sink, which is pretty impressive for such a tiny theater. There were a few bits which counted on costumes to make the difference, and Marian Narveson came through every time with everything from capes to hats to a mammy outfit.

Kitchen Witches finishes its run tonight and tomorrow at 8 pm, Santa Clara Players, tickets can be reserved online here.

Tags:

Review: Doubt (no spoilers)

  • Jan. 4th, 2009 at 8:47 PM
How_yosemite
In a word: uneven. Superb acting in spots by leads Philip Seymour Hoffman, Meryl Streep and Amy Adams, sabotaged by an uneven script, mediocre cinematography, often poor shot selection and editing mistakes. For example, we are shown a cut-away scene several times in the film of the street corner the school is on, with students pouring down the sidewalks during a bright sunny afternoon. At least once the scene cuts directly to a downpour at night. Audio is atrocious, as if they recorded using 1960's technology - there is lots of over-modulation in the shouting scenes. Color is muted, as if they are going for a near B&W feel. For me this is a FAIL. YMMV.

John Patrick Shanley wrote the screenplay, which was based on his stage play, and also directed this film. His only other directing credit is Joe Versus The Volcano, and it shows. There are some excellent, innovative scene setups, and the set dressing is meticulously accurate. There are also some attempts at artsy-fartsy shot setups which are major FAIL. Some of the dialog is gripping, while some is BS stuck into the film in an awkward attempt to adjust how we feel about a character. One strong point in the directing is the sermons. The writing and the way they were shot is riveting.

Hoffman plays a parish priest. Streep plays the principal of the parish school. Adams is a too-young, too-innocent nun teaching US History. The principal is convinced that the priest has taken an unhealthy interest in one of the altar boys, the school's one black student. She has no proof, not even any real circumstantial evidence. Hence the title of the film.

80-year-old Alice Drummond deserves some kind of award for magnificent acting in the role of nearly blind Sister Veronica, but the part is probably too small for a supporting actress nod.

None of the child actors are anything to write home about, and the other sisters are non-entities as far as the writer is concerned.

This is definitely one of Streep's best performances, very much against type, and they hid her trademark nose very well behind glasses and a bonnet. All the sisters wore a bonnet instead of a wimple, and I wonder if that was for historical accuracy, or the costumer was on drugs. Any costumers out there care to educate me?

I did not like the ending. I won't spoil it for you, but suffice to say it ends with about 3 minutes too many of Streep which, in my eyes, destroyed her character (and the word "sabotage" comes to mind again).

It's a powerful film, despite its flaws, and well worth seeing if only for the mixed messages it gives.

Tags:

Review - The Name of the Wind

  • Dec. 16th, 2008 at 9:31 AM
How_yosemite
Patrick Rothfuss' fantasy novel The Name of the Wind was recommended to me by three or four friends who said that even if you're like me and generally loathe fantasy novels, the writing in this one is good enough to give it a read. And that turns out to be mostly true.

It is well-written, though towards the end things bog down a bit as the author prepares us to buy the sequel, which I will not be doing. Many of the characters are well-drawn, many are woefully superficial. As with many fantasy novelists, Rothfuss takes liberties with the powers of the various supporting charaters, adding to them when the whim strikes. Some of the magic described can only be understood if one is the author.

There are several females who have a place in the young male protagonist's heart, and it's unclear whom he prefers. Save it for the sequel, I guess.

The book starts out asd a page-turner, but by the end I was counting pages to the end. And coming to the end and finding the story still had a long way to go, I was not amused.

Worth used bookstore price if you're not a fantasy fan, worth full price and sequels if you are.

Tags:

Review - Mindbend

  • Dec. 16th, 2008 at 9:23 AM
How_yosemite

Dr. Robin Cook's Mindbend is out of print for a reason. Not a well-crafted book, the characters and situations seem contrived, and we find out from the epilogue that he wrote it to push a political cause promoting regulation of medical practices which the book doesn't really focus on. The plot pits a medical student against a big nasty drug company which is inviting OB/GYN doctors on cruises where they are drugged and subjected to behavior modification and on their return home, quit private practice and join a clinic which specializes in performing unneeded abortions to harvest fetuses for research.

Gag me with a speculum.

The writing style is stilted and not Cook's usual free-flowing form, but I read it to the end the way one keeps staring at a wrapped wound in hopes to see what's under the bandages.

Not worth plucking off the free coffee shop book exchange rack. My copy has been composted.

Tags:

Review - Skinny Dip

  • Dec. 16th, 2008 at 9:12 AM
How_yosemite
I picked this up at a used book stand in Thailand, and it was good light entertainment during some of my travels. Carl Hiaasen builds some very interesting characters in this anti-mystery tale of adventure on the high and not-so-high seas. The book starts with our heroine Joey being thrown off a cruise ship by her husband. And while the reader knows she survives, only Joey and the man who pulls her off a bale of marijuana knows this. The trail to revenge takes up the rest of the book.

Not quite, but almost a page-turner, whenever I put it down I looked forward to the next chapter. While it's not a Great Work, it's well written, and except for the fate of the husband, it wraps up loose ends in a way I was happy with. Worth used bookstore price.

Tags:

Mini-review; Wall-E

  • Sep. 7th, 2008 at 5:22 PM
How_yosemite
Went to the movies to spend the early afternoon in air conditioned splendor after yesterday's 98 degree temps. It only got up to 77 today, and there's a nice breeze, so that didn't turn out to be such an advantage.

Saw Wall-E, which was okay, sort of. Maybe. I caught myself nodding off several times. I caught myself saying WTF even more times. The movie opens with the biggest WTF in Disney animated movie history. Okay, I'm a musical theater geek, so maybe to me this is a bigger WTF for me than it would be for you, but I suspect not. It opens with the audio from one of the opening numbers from Hello Dolly. And we're not talking about the title song or any of the songs which have become standards. We're talking about Put On Your Sunday Clothes,starting with its utterly forgettable 3-minute tuneless intro. In the movie it's a 5-minute Gene Kelly over-choreographed dance number, which is shown several times in the movie as Wall-E is obsessed with this number, which is on a videotape he found in the scrap heap and has saved. Also repeated ad nauseum is a 30-second clip from the much more recognizable It Only Takes a Moment, which serves as the romantic hook for the movie.

I happen to love Hello Dolly, except for the parts Barbara Streisand is in, but Wall-E is such a mismatch it went a long way to ruining it for me.

Another WTF is the characters. Much of the action takes place on an ark spaceship which the inhabitants of Earth boarded 700 years ago to escape the pollution and garbage for what was supposed to be a 5-year cleanup (of which Wall-E is the sole remaining operational bot). They have all chosen to live their entire lives in hover-lounge chairs plugged into the internet and they are all now so obese they can't even stand. As much as I love to park my fat butt in my comfy recliner, I can't see an ark ship where everyone chooses to be fat and lazy. In any population there will be some insane Morning People who jog everywhere, spend too many hours in the gym and the pool, and have no use for the Internet except to download aerobics videos and  nutrition plans. I think the movie would have been a lot less boring if there was some diversity in the population on  board.

They tried real hard to build a love story between 700-year-old Wall-E, who looks like a trash compactor on tank treads with a pair of binoculars slapped on top,  and brand spanking new Eva* who looks like a hermetically sealed white ceramic martini shaker. It didn't work for me. Part of it was the lame lame lame Hello Dolly obsession, part of it was just poor writing.

*In the movie, the character played by Fred Willard spells out the acronym as EVA, which is what Wall-E calls her, but she calls herself Eve, and so do all the other characters. Another WTF.

There were two highlights for me. The first is the performance by he voice of the captain. Jeff Garlin was superb. He also played the only character to whom  the writers had given any...er...character. The second highlight was the closing credits. No easter egg, but like Kung-Fu Panda they were artistic and entertaining, and the music was highly danceable (there were about a dozen kids dancing to it beneath the screen, sometimes jumping up to try to touch the screen. Made me smile.).

I went on a Sunday afternoon hoping the kids in the audience would liven things up, but they were put to sleep almost as much as I was. Not worth matinée price, and probably a huge snoozer on DVD.

Tags:

Review - The Ghost Brigades

  • Aug. 31st, 2008 at 9:42 AM
How_yosemite
John Scalzi's The Ghost Brigades is billed as the sequel to Old Man's War, but it's not really. It's a spin-off. The second book is to the first book what The Jeffersons is to All In the Family, or for the younger folks out there, what Angel is to Buffy. The protagonist from the first book is completely missing from the second, except when he is dredged up in the final pages to make the lead-in for the next book. If you have not read Old Man's War, the last few pages of The Ghost Brigades is a huge WTFBBQ. More on that later.

It's a good read, entertaining, and except for the ending it stands on its own nicely. The focus is handed off back and forth between Jane, the love interest from the first book and a new character, Jared, the clone of a mad scientist who has been grown to be a Special Forces soldier. Jane is Jared's squad leader, but because he's been cloned for a nefarious purpose by the top brass, he also does time as a guinea pig.

I have an observation which others may look at as criticism, but I'm fairly neutral about because I tend to do the same things when I write fiction. Scalzi is very light on physical descriptions of his characters. He has painted himself into something of a corner by making his Good Guys look a lot alike (green skin, cat-like eyes) but hey, these folks are all gen-gineered clones from real people, they ought to have some identifiable differences other than personality. The several non-human races also get shortchanged this way - I have no clear image of what any of them look like.

He is also very light on physical descriptions of the settings. He only mentions items in a room if they are being used by the characters, and he only mentions features of a place in the most general terms. If you're a fan of those books which have maps in them, you will find the tales of the Colonial Defense Forces to be lacking in this regard. Artists would have a difficult time illustrating these books. In fact, the covers for both books are pretty generic.

Both books are all about the minds of the characters, which brings me to a non-neutral criticism. The Jane of Ghost is not the Jane of Old Man's. They have different personalities, and more important to me, she never thinks about or communicates with the protagonist of the first book until the final pages, when the last chapter of the first book suddenly becomes the focus for the ending of the second.

Scalzi has created an interesting universe, and sets up the framework for an infinite number of spin-off books. I'll be reading the next one, The Last Colony.

Tags: